Warringah Radio Control Society Incorporated
Where your dreams of flying become true!
Home News
News
MOP019 - clarification PDF Print E-mail
Written by clive weatherhead   
Friday, 03 February 2012 11:42

Folks

There has been quite a bun-fight over the last few weeks over a rewording of MOP019 from MAAA. Many people have read the revised wording and drawn a number of (widely different) interpretations from it, which has resulted in numerous individual questions, submissions, and probably the best example of "send three and fourpence..." that has been seen for many a year.

The following correspondence has been received from MASNSW and the attachments can be opened from the links below it:

"The attached correspondence has been received from the MAAA President with the request that it be circulated as a matter of urgency.  It is a matter that should be bought to attention of all club members, especially those with an interest in public flying displays.

The MAAA release will be discussed at the next MAS NSW Business Meeting to be held at “Workers”, Parramatta on the 10 February 2012, starting at 8pm.  At this time the executive will table all items of correspondence in relation to this matter and it will be open for discussion, review and subsequent inclusion in the minutes."

MAAA statement on MOP019

MAAA display statement

As a club, WRCS should present a common view on this issue to MASNSW and MAAA, leaving individuals to represent their personal views and ideas, separately and as individuals only, if they wish. Several submissions, of varying degrees of heat, were received by the committee and the MAAA MOP and CASA documents relating to this issue have been studied in detail. As a result, the committee has submitted the following letter to MASNSW. 

 

To:  Tim Nolan

Secretary MAS

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

  

From :  Brian Porman

    Hon. Secretary,

                                                                                                                                  31 January  2011

 Dear Tim

              

                 RE:  WRCS submission in the matter of the wording of MOP 019

 

Arising from our committee meeting last night you are advised:

 The WRCS committee is ambivalent about the wording of MOP 019, but in the knowledge that a considerable number of member submissions have been received by MAS/MAAA, the committee has the utmost confidence that the MAS/MAAA executives will reach a final wording of MOP 019 that will remove any perceived difficulties.

 The meeting unanimously expressed their admiration for the executive of MAAA and MAS for the amount of time they have had to devote to issues raised as a result of an application for a public air display.

 Arising out of our debate the WRCS committee also expressed an opinion that the MAS/MAAA ought to mandate that at every public display:

‘ Every aircraft, regardless of weight, must be MOP’d’      

  

Best wishes

 

Brian Porman

Secretary

To expand, briefly:

  1. We have confirmation, in writing, that MOP019 does nothing to affect the events that WRCS runs at Belrose. These are not public displays despite the fact that members of the public are welcome to attend
  2. Despite several interpretations that MOP019 was requiring a contest director and flight line director to ensure that all flights were safely completed, the actual obligation is about using reasonable judgement to satisfy themself on competence. At WRCS, our contest director and flight line director already do this and are always aware of their obligation. That's why the flight line director has absolute authority to ground pilots or insist that someone changes their flight path, for example
  3. The words in the letter, above, were carefully chosen after very careful analysis of the documents. There is clearly some ambiguity which MAAA and MAS will be addressing, but the committee is satisfied that the changes don't affect our club events, don't place any further obligation on our contest and flight line directors, and that there is an appropriate governance programme in place to make sure that the comments and future changes will be considered
  4. Finally, there is currently a requirement to MOP any model over 7kg and, in so doing, the pilot has to demonstrate their skill and competence and be signed off, as the model is, through the full flight pattern. The committee reached the view that doing the same (for public display purposes) with smaller models would assist in assuring pilot competence and model integrity.
That's where we are. I think that most people are also genuinely hoping that the energy expended on this issue can now be redirected. That said, the topic is almost certain to get an airing at the Club Meeting on 14th February so, if you do have strong views, still, then there's a perfect forum for them.
Clive


 

Comments (0)

 
Keeping our site clean PDF Print E-mail
Written by clive weatherhead   
Thursday, 02 February 2012 07:59

Folks

We have a few people still leaving their litter at the flying site for others to clear up, and leaving their dog-ends over the floor of the sheds. All the maintenance of our site is done by volunteers, without compensation, for the good of everyone. It really isn't fair that they need to spend extra time to clear up dog-ends, old plastic ties, bits of old balsa, packing materials or the remains of someone's lunch. 

Please, everyone, take your own rubbish away and dispose of it yourself, and put your dog-ends in the container provided. If we all try to leave the field in slightly better condition than we found it, our site will be perfect - and stay that way.

If you see anyone leaving litter, please have a word with them, or let me know and I'll put it right.

Thanks

Clive

Comments (0)

 
Titfer PDF Print E-mail
Written by clive weatherhead   
Monday, 30 January 2012 07:12

Mr Buckley has mislaid his hat. It has his name badge and gold wings on it, and was probably left at the field or in the car park. If you find it, could you contact Col by clicking This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it please.

Ta

Ed

Comments (0)

 
The worst maiden ever? PDF Print E-mail
Written by clive weatherhead   
Saturday, 28 January 2012 07:35
Raj suggests that you might enjoy the read at this LINK

Comments (0)

 
Update on approved equipment PDF Print E-mail
Written by clive weatherhead   
Friday, 27 January 2012 06:56

Folks

MOP058 has been updated to include the acceptance of "Orange" receivers. You can download the document here, and the bit in grey at the back is the changed text.

Ed

Comments (0)

 
« StartPrev12345678910NextEnd »

Page 1 of 44